The Association of Emergency Medicine Specialists is committed to ensuring that advertising activities remain completely independent from editorial decision-making and scientific content.
The Association supports the responsible, ethical, transparent, and accountable use of artificial intelligence technologies in scholarly publishing.
Appeals and complaints arising during the publication process are evaluated fairly, transparently, impartially, and in accordance with established editorial procedures.
This policy defines the principles for recognizing intellectual contributions accurately and assigning responsibility for published scholarly work transparently.
The reliability of scholarly publishing depends on the transparent disclosure and appropriate management of any financial, personal, academic, or institutional conflicts of interest.
This policy outlines the principles governing copyright protection, licensing, reuse, and the responsible distribution of published academic content.
The Association promotes scientific transparency, appropriate data sharing, and the reproducibility of published research whenever ethical and legal requirements allow.
The long-term accessibility, integrity, preservation, and continuity of published scholarly content are regarded as essential responsibilities of academic publishing.
The Association recognizes diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility as fundamental principles of ethical and responsible scholarly publishing.
Editorial decisions are conducted independently, transparently, ethically, and impartially in accordance with high academic and professional standards.
This policy addresses unethical practices that may compromise academic trust, scientific integrity, and the reliability of the scholarly record.
The Association supports the free circulation of scientific knowledge and aims to improve the accessibility, visibility, and impact of published research.
Submitted manuscripts are evaluated through an independent, impartial, confidential, and ethically conducted peer review process.
Scientific originality, respect for intellectual property rights, and research integrity are fundamental requirements for all submitted and published works.
Allegations of research or publication misconduct are evaluated systematically, impartially, confidentially, and transparently in line with recognized ethical guidance.
Scholarly communication continues after publication through corrections, discussions, clarifications, retractions, and other actions required to protect the scientific record.
The Association is committed to scientific integrity, research transparency, ethical approval standards, participant protection, and responsible reporting.
ACTIVITIES